Israeli Documentary 'NAZA' Exposes Military AI and Gaza Civilian Killings

The origins of 'NAZA' lie in the testimonies of 24 Israeli military insiders who participated in operations in Gaza. Directors Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, both Israelis, gathered these accounts anonymously to protect their sources and themselves. Their goal was to shed light on the use of artificial intelligence in Israeli military targeting, particularly how it led to the deaths of Palestinian civilians after the October 7 attacks.

The filmmakers have spoken openly about their sense of complicity as Israelis and the unique position this gave them to reveal details that might otherwise remain hidden. Their approach sought to challenge official narratives and provoke a deeper reckoning within Israeli society.

On September 10, 2026, 'NAZA' premiered at the Venice Film Festival. The film immediately drew attention for its raw content and the gravity of the testimonies presented. Audience members responded with a record-breaking 25-minute standing ovation, the longest in the festival's history.

International media quickly picked up the story, highlighting the film's revelations about AI-assisted military operations and intentional civilian targeting. The documentary was praised for its investigative work and emotional impact, and it was awarded a Special Jury Prize at Venice.

However, the film's release also triggered fierce backlash in Israel. On September 13, Israeli Culture Minister Miki Zohar publicly called for the filmmakers to be stripped of their citizenship, labeling them traitors. Other members of the Israeli government echoed these sentiments, intensifying the controversy.

Meanwhile, the Israeli military officially rejected the claims made in the documentary, dismissing the testimonies of the whistleblowers. The filmmakers, however, have stood by their work, emphasizing the importance of accountability and truth.

As of mid-September 2026, 'NAZA' remains at the center of a heated debate. The film has won international acclaim and an award, but its directors face threats of citizenship revocation in Israel. The controversy has underscored deep divisions over how the Gaza conflict is remembered and discussed, both within Israel and abroad.

The filmmakers continue to defend their documentary, while the Israeli government maintains its criticism and the military denies the film's allegations. Global interest in the story appears to be growing, with further screenings and discussions expected.

The next steps are uncertain. It remains to be seen whether Israeli officials will follow through on threats to revoke the filmmakers' citizenship. The ongoing public and international response could influence how the film is received in Israel and whether it prompts further investigations into the claims it presents.