Callaway Ends Partnership With Good Good Golf After Ad Depicts Violence
Callaway Golf has severed ties with YouTube brand Good Good following backlash over an ad showing a woman being shoved, highlighting growing concerns about gender representation in sports marketing.
By Ravi Menon · First published 23 Aug 2026
In brief
- Callaway Golf has ended its partnership with Good Good Golf following backlash over a violent advertisement featuring a woman.
- Good Good Golf deleted the controversial ad and issued a public apology, acknowledging its inappropriateness and lack of inclusivity.
- Retailers have pulled Good Good merchandise, and the brand has withdrawn sponsorship from a PGA Tour event due to the controversy.
- Callaway pledged to invest $1 million in initiatives supporting women and inclusivity in golf after the incident.
- The situation has ignited discussions about gender representation in sports marketing and may lead to new industry standards for ad approvals.
Timeline · 8 moments
Good Good Golf apologizes for controversial video ad
The Independent ↗Good Good removes ad after backlash over violence
nu.nl ↗Callaway Golf CEO says 'mistakes were made' over ad
CBS Top Stories ↗PGA Tour CEO criticizes Good Good and Callaway over ad
Sky Sports ↗Callaway ends partnership with Good Good Golf
NBC News ↗Retailers pull gear after Callaway-Good Good split
MarketWatch ↗Callaway ditches Good Good over sexist video backlash
BBC - Home ↗Good Good CEO criticizes Callaway after split
Business Insider ↗How it started
In late August 2026, Good Good Golf, a popular YouTube golf brand, released a promotional video in partnership with Callaway Golf. The ad featured co-founder Garrett Clark pushing a woman to the ground after she reached for a golf club.
The video was intended to promote a new co-branded driver. However, its depiction of violence against a woman drew immediate and widespread criticism online. Many viewers said the ad trivialized violence and highlighted ongoing problems with gender representation in golf advertising.
How it unfolded
After the backlash, Good Good quickly deleted the video and issued a public apology, stating the ad did not reflect their values of inclusivity and respect. According to The Independent and nu.nl, the company acknowledged the inappropriateness of the content and moved to remove it from all platforms.
Callaway Golf, which had collaborated on the campaign, also apologized. The company's CEO admitted that 'mistakes were made' and that the ad should never have been approved, as reported by CBS Top Stories and Soap Central. Both brands faced mounting criticism from the public and within the golf industry, including from PGA Tour CEO Brian Rolapp, who questioned their accountability, according to Sky Sports.
The controversy quickly led to broader consequences. Retailers began pulling Good Good merchandise, and the Golf Channel delayed related programming, MarketWatch reported. Good Good also withdrew its sponsorship from a PGA Tour event, impacting the November tournament at Omni Barton Creek Resort, as covered by CBS Sports and ESPN.
By August 27, Callaway announced it was ending its partnership with Good Good Golf immediately, according to NBC News and The Guardian. Callaway also pledged to invest $1 million in initiatives supporting women and inclusivity in golf.
Where it stands
Callaway has officially cut all business ties with Good Good Golf. Retailers have pulled gear, and Good Good is no longer sponsoring upcoming PGA Tour events. Both companies continue to deal with the fallout, both in public relations and their business operations.
Good Good's CEO has publicly criticized Callaway for its handling of the situation, suggesting the company was involved in the ad's creation and approval. Meanwhile, Callaway is focusing on repairing its reputation and supporting diversity efforts within golf.
What to watch
The controversy has sparked ongoing discussions about gender representation in sports marketing and the approval processes behind major campaigns. It remains to be seen how the fallout will affect both brands and whether new industry standards will emerge for vetting advertising content.


