Marvel's VisionQuest Arrives on Disney+ After Early Praise and Mixed Reviews
Following a surprise Comic Con screening, Marvel's WandaVision follow-up has reached Disney+ a day earlier than announced, with full reviews more divided than the first reactions.
By Hushread Stories, written with AI from 20 outlets · First published 14 Oct 2026
In brief
- Marvel screened the first VisionQuest episode as a surprise finale to its New York Comic Con panel.
- The Disney+ debut moved from October 14 to October 13, with a two part premiere now available.
- Paul Bettany returns as Vision, while James Spader reprises Ultron in the final installment of the WandaVision trilogy.
- Early audience reactions were enthusiastic, but subsequent reviews disagree over whether the series delivers an emotionally engaging story.
- Release schedule and episode title coverage accompanied the launch, with attention now turning to the remaining episodes.
Timeline · 5 moments
Two part premiere earns praise for thoughtful opening
Forbes ↗VisionQuest makes its earlier debut on Disney+
CNN Brasil ↗Full reviews challenge the enthusiasm of early reactions
Variety Movies ↗Disney+ debut moves forward and episode titles emerge
Bleeding Cool ↗Marvel surprises Comic Con audience with VisionQuest screening
Variety Movies ↗How it started
Marvel introduced VisionQuest with a surprise screening of its first episode at New York Comic Con on October 8. The screening closed the studio's panel, according to Variety, and the first reactions praised it as a worthy successor to WandaVision.
The series completes a television trilogy that began with WandaVision in 2021 and continued with Agatha All Along, The Wrap reported. This time, Paul Bettany's Vision takes the lead, with James Spader returning as Ultron, according to Forbes.
How it unfolded
On October 8 and 9, coverage focused on the enthusiastic response from the screening. Variety described glowing first reactions, while The Wrap gathered responses calling the show terrific and trippy. Those were early impressions, not a consensus from full reviews.
On October 12, the release date changed. Bleeding Cool reported that Disney+ would debut VisionQuest on Tuesday, October 13, rather than the previously announced October 14. Its coverage also included episode titles and the release schedule. Forbes separately confirmed the move to a day earlier.
Full reviews published on October 12 complicated the initial picture. TechRadar praised Bettany and Spader, and /Film found a richer, more emotional story beneath the surface. But IndieWire called the series a tedious fatherhood drama, while Variety said it struggled to connect emotionally.
The premise puts family alongside questions of identity. The Hollywood Reporter described Vision laying low until a bounty hunter forces him to flee with a reincarnation of his speedster son. Its review credited Bettany and Spader with elevating a show it found sometimes moving and sometimes exhausting.
By October 14, the two-part premiere had prompted another positive assessment. Forbes described a thoughtful opening about love, grief, identity and resurrection, calling the series off to a terrific start.
Where it stands
VisionQuest has now reached Disney+, following the October 13 debut reported by CNN Brasil. The earlier October 14 date still appears in the initial announcement coverage, but later reports explicitly identify the launch as having moved forward one day.
The critical picture is mixed rather than uniformly glowing. The praise from the Comic Con screening remains part of the story, but the full reviews show a clear split over the series' emotional impact, from /Film's enthusiasm to Variety's reservations.
What to watch
The remaining episodes will extend the story beyond the two-part opening reviewed by Forbes. Release schedules have been published by Deadline and Bleeding Cool, although the supplied coverage does not give the individual dates or episode titles.
The central question is whether Vision's relationship with his son can sustain the emotional weight of this trilogy's ending. That is already the dividing line between the positive assessment from /Film and the more critical review from Variety.


