Moderna shares plunge after cancer vaccine data leak unsettles investors
Moderna shares fell about 25% after partial melanoma vaccine data circulated online, even as fuller results showed benefits from the treatment developed with Merck.
By Hushread Stories, from 20 outlets · First published 23 Oct 2026
In brief
- Moderna shares plunged about 25% after a reported leak of partial data from its experimental cancer vaccine trial.
- Moderna and Merck's personalised mRNA vaccine met key endpoints in a major melanoma trial.
- The companies said the vaccine with Merck's immunotherapy reduced the risk of recurrence or death by 42%.
- Phase 3 results also showed a 38% reduction in the risk of cancer spreading, according to new coverage.
- The companies are expected to present Phase 3 data at a medical conference this weekend.
Timeline · 6 moments
New coverage reports reduced risk of melanoma spreading
Times now ↗Reports detail 42% reduction in melanoma recurrence or death
CNN Brasil ↗Coverage gives conflicting figures for the reported benefit
Financial Times ↗Full trial data released later Thursday appear positive
CNBC ↗Moderna shares plunge about 25%, reversing vaccine optimism
Forbes ↗Unverified vaccine report circulates on social platform X
ABC ↗Update 23 Oct 2026, 3:15 pm UTC
New coverage adds detail to the positive trial findings, reporting that the vaccine reduced the risk of cancer spreading by 38%, as well as melanoma recurrence. The reporting also frames the results as a potential turning point for personalised cancer treatment; the stock plunge remains the central event in the published headline.
Update 23 Oct 2026, 7:35 am UTC
New reports put a clearer figure on the trial result: Moderna and Merck said the vaccine combined with Merck's immunotherapy reduced the risk of melanoma recurrence or death by 42%. The stock plunge and reported data leak remain the story's focus, so the published headline still stands.
How it started
Moderna's personalized cancer vaccine had helped fuel a substantial stock rally in 2026. Then a reported leak of trial data sent shares down about 25%, according to Forbes.
The vaccine, developed with Merck, targets melanoma. MarketWatch reported that the companies were expected to share Phase 3 results at a medical conference this weekend. Partial data reached investors before that presentation.
How it unfolded
On October 22, ABC reported that a user on X had circulated an unverified report about the vaccine. Its coverage put Moderna's share decline at as much as 24%.
Forbes described a 25% plunge, a sharp reversal from the rally built on optimism about the vaccine. Bloomberg reported that Merck shares also fell, describing investors as unconvinced that the findings established a new era of cancer treatments.
Full data were released later Thursday. According to CNBC, those results appeared positive against Wall Street expectations before the release, despite the selloff following the partial leak.
STAT News reported that detailed results confirmed the vaccine met key endpoints in the melanoma trial. Its summary described a 42% reduction in disease recurrence risk compared with standard treatment.
The coverage differs on the headline benefit. The Independent and Ars Technica Tech reported a 42% reduction in recurrence or death risk, while Financial Times reported 58% for recurrence or death. The supplied reports do not explain that discrepancy.
Where it stands
The clinical findings and the market response point in different directions. Associated Press reported that the major trial showed a significant reduction in the chance of melanoma returning. But Financial Times described the results as failing to exceed investors' lofty expectations.
The reporting describes a leak of partial data, not an established cybersecurity breach. ABC called the circulated material unverified, while CNBC distinguished the partial leak from the full results released later that day.
What to watch
The next scheduled milestone is the weekend medical conference, where Moderna and Merck are expected to share Phase 3 data, according to MarketWatch. The presentation will provide another opportunity to examine the findings beyond the partial material that initially circulated.
A central unresolved issue in the supplied coverage is why reports give different risk reductions. Until that difference is explained, the 42% and 58% figures should not be treated as interchangeable.


