OpenAI Pledges Not to Use Disputed Apple Secrets as Lawsuit Advances
Apple has secured access to some OpenAI records, while OpenAI has made its own theft allegations and agreed not to use the Apple secrets at issue.
By Hushread Stories, written with AI from 25 outlets · First published 15 Oct 2026 · Chapter 2 of 2
Earlier: Apple Wins Early Discovery as OpenAI Alleges Device Secrets Reached Apple
In brief
- Apple secured access to some OpenAI documents and employee testimony as its trade secrets lawsuit proceeds.
- OpenAI alleges a former employee took more than 100 confidential files before returning to work at Apple.
- The disputed OpenAI material allegedly included detailed images and plans relating to a device not yet released.
- OpenAI voluntarily agreed not to use the alleged Apple trade secrets while the companies continue their legal battle.
- The case remains unresolved, with Apple's request to restrict use and OpenAI's dismissal request brought before the court.
Timeline · 5 moments
Apple responds to OpenAI's trade secret theft allegations
9to5Mac Apple ↗OpenAI agrees not to use disputed Apple secrets
9to5Mac Apple ↗OpenAI alleges former employee took over 100 files
The Verge - All Posts Tech ↗Court hears competing requests over restrictions and dismissal
The Next Web ↗Judge grants Apple limited early access to OpenAI evidence
9to5Mac Apple ↗How it started
Apple's lawsuit accuses OpenAI of obtaining proprietary information about upcoming products through former Apple employees. The case also names former employees and io Products, according to 9to5Mac Apple.
The dispute concerns products that have not yet reached customers. The Financial Times reported that the court battle comes as OpenAI prepares to unveil an AI device designed by Sir Jony Ive. The companies are also partners: Business Line reported that their two-year-old partnership brought ChatGPT into Apple software.
How it unfolded
On October 13, Judge Edward Davila granted some of Apple's requests for expedited discovery, allowing it to obtain evidence early in the case, according to 9to5Mac Apple. The ruling covered interview materials involving former Apple employees, private messages and testimony, TechCrunch reported. Apple did not receive everything it requested.
On October 14, the companies headed to court in San Jose over opposing requests. Apple wanted to stop OpenAI from using information allegedly taken from it, while OpenAI sought to have the case thrown out, according to The Next Web.
That day, OpenAI made its own allegations in a court filing. It claimed a former employee took more than 100 files about its product plans before joining Apple, The Verge reported. The files allegedly included detailed images of an unreleased device, according to The Wall Street Journal.
OpenAI also alleged that the employee sent files to a personal account and later presented information about the unreleased product to senior Apple leadership, the Guardian reported. These are OpenAI's allegations, not established findings.
During the October 14 hearing, OpenAI voluntarily agreed not to use Apple's alleged trade secrets while the litigation continues, according to 9to5Mac Apple. AppleInsider reported the following day that the commitment came after the judge said he was highly likely to grant Apple's injunction.
Where it stands
Apple has won access to some evidence, not a final ruling on its theft allegations. OpenAI's commitment limits its use of the disputed Apple information while the case proceeds, according to 9to5Mac Apple.
The allegations now run in both directions. Apple has also responded to OpenAI's claims about the departing employee, 9to5Mac Apple reported on October 15, though the supplied coverage does not give the substance of that response.
What to watch
The next questions concern the outcome of the competing court requests: what restrictions will apply to the disputed information, and whether OpenAI succeeds in its attempt to dismiss the case. The Next Web identified those requests as the central issues before the court.
The documents and testimony Apple has secured could help test its allegations. The discovery ruling gives Apple access to evidence, but only part of what it sought, according to AppleInsider.


