Politics 12 sources · over 3 days Latest coverage 2 Nov 2026, 1:18 am UTC

Appeals Court Again Rejects Trump Bid to Separate California Ballots

A divided appeals panel refused to order California to set aside more than 20,000 disputed ballots, rejecting the administration's latest attempt to separate votes over citizenship allegations.

By Hushread Stories, from 12 outlets · First published 30 Oct 2026

In brief

  1. A federal appeals court again rejected the Trump administration's request to set aside disputed California ballots on Friday.
  2. The administration sought to separate ballots from more than 20,000 people it alleges might be noncitizens.
  3. The appeals panel ruled against the administration's request by a vote of two to one.
  4. The ruling leaves federal officials unable to stop California from processing the disputed ballots.
  5. New analysis found voter roll mismatches, while the possible Supreme Court confrontation remains unresolved.
Appeals Court Again Rejects Trump Bid to Separate California Ballots
Source: LA Times

Timeline · 6 moments

6 moments Open the full timeline →

Bill Essayli urges voter roll checks in dispute

New York Post ↗

Analysts identify mismatches in voter eligibility list

The Hill ↗

Analysis flags missing names on California voter rolls

Times now ↗

Trump praises prosecutor after Justice Department setbacks

New York Post ↗

Filing questions claims about noncitizen voting

Al Jazeera ↗

Appeals panel again rejects request to separate California ballots

The Hill ↗

Update 2 Nov 2026, 1:18 am UTC

New analysis submitted to the case says more than 40 per cent of the people flagged as possible noncitizen voters do not appear on California's voter rolls, according to Times Now. The Hill, citing The Associated Press, also reported mismatches in the administration's list. The New York Post reported that Los Angeles federal prosecutor Bill Essayli said checking voter rolls would help restore confidence in elections.

Update 31 Oct 2026, 10:23 pm UTC

The latest coverage adds a legal filing questioning the administration's claims: data scientists found that many people it identified as likely noncitizens were erroneously flagged, according to Al Jazeera. The New York Post also reported that President Trump praised Los Angeles's top federal prosecutor after the Justice Department's legal setbacks; no new ruling or appeal outcome is reported.

How it started

The dispute concerns the Trump administration's effort to make California set aside ballots from more than 20,000 people it alleges might be noncitizens, according to NBC News. That is an allegation, not an established finding about those voters' citizenship.

The administration wanted the ballots separated until they could be verified, The Hill reported. The Justice Department's request concerned ballots received in the midterm election, according to CBS Top Stories.

How it unfolded

The administration had already been refused once before Friday's decision. The LA Times described the October 30 ruling as the second time the federal appeals court denied its request to block the ballots. The supplied coverage does not date that earlier rejection.

On October 30, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Justice Department's request to have California set aside the disputed ballots, CBS Top Stories reported.

The panel divided two to one. According to NYT Politics, the majority declined to order the state to separate more than 20,000 mail-in ballots, calling the proposed action plainly unconstitutional.

Where it stands

The latest ruling means federal officials cannot stop California from processing the more than 20,000 ballots at issue, according to the New York Post.

The decision rejects the administration's requested intervention. The supplied reporting does not establish that the people whose ballots were challenged are noncitizens.

What to watch

The next question is whether the dispute reaches the Supreme Court. The Independent reported that a confrontation there appeared imminent and that the appeals court warned the administration's effort could jeopardize the midterm elections. The supplied coverage does not report a Supreme Court decision.

Spotted an error? Email [email protected] and we'll fix it.

More in Politics

All →